| 71 | | * [http://forum.lighttpd.net/topic/847 mem consumption question] |
| 72 | | * [http://forum.lighttpd.net/topic/1178#3299 XCache is faster?] |
| 73 | | * [http://www.sitebuddy.com/php/accelerator_xcache Is XCache more stable than other cachers on Windows?] |
| 74 | | * [http://www.vbulletin.com/forum/showthread.php?t=201257 huge performance boost on smp box after the switching to XCache] |
| | 71 | * Discussions |
| | 72 | * [http://forum.lighttpd.net/topic/847 mem consumption question] |
| | 73 | * [http://forum.lighttpd.net/topic/1178#3299 XCache is faster?] |
| | 74 | * [http://www.sitebuddy.com/php/accelerator_xcache Is XCache more stable than other cachers on Windows?] |
| | 75 | * Pro Feedbacks |
| | 76 | * [http://www.vbulletin.com/forum/showthread.php?t=201257 huge performance boost on smp box after the switching to XCache] |
| | 77 | * Con Feedbacks |
| | 78 | * Benchmarks |
| | 79 | * [http://itst.net/654-php-on-fire-three-opcode-caches-compared PHP on Fire: Five Opcode Caches compared] |
