Changes between Version 13 and Version 14 of Introduction


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2013-09-03T01:03:40+02:00 (14 months ago)
Author:
AlexisWilke
Comment:

Noticed that a link was invalid (the URL includes square brackets, converted to %5B/%5D)

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Introduction

    v13 v14  
    1313 
    1414== But why do you write XCache after that? Why not contribute to ea/apc? == 
    15 I DID file bug reports, submit patches to both [http://pecl.php.net/bugs/search.php?cmd=display&package_name[]=APC&status=All apc bug report system] and [http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=69426&atid=524487 truck-mmcache on sf.net] and interact with [http://blog.zoeloelip.be/ zoeloelip], one of the main [https://sourceforge.net/users/zoeloelip/ developer] of eaccelerator. He's the first one who read my XCache source, long before XCache was published online. I'm not sure, but I think that his idea of rewriting ea_dasm.c is based on my Disassembler idea in XCache :) 
     15I DID file bug reports, submit patches to both [http://pecl.php.net/bugs/search.php?cmd=display&package_name%5B%5D=APC&status=All apc bug report system] and [http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=69426&atid=524487 truck-mmcache on sf.net] and interact with [http://blog.zoeloelip.be/ zoeloelip], one of the main [https://sourceforge.net/users/zoeloelip/ developer] of eaccelerator. He's the first one who read my XCache source, long before XCache was published online. I'm not sure, but I think that his idea of rewriting ea_dasm.c is based on my Disassembler idea in XCache :) 
    1616 
    1717There are many reasons for me to write XCache instead of using APC or EA: